Emastered vs landr pro#

I suspect I know why, but we’ll get there a little later…

LANDR’s master itself leaves a little to be desired, and many have noted that whilst it has a nice body to the lower end of a track, the upper register feels thin, even reedy, and really out of balance with the lower end.

Its options for bulk-uploading files are handy, it offers an online collaboration function, and there is even a feature to allow you to master a whole album, ensuring the mastering is consistent throughout.

Emastered vs landr pro#

Its minimalist GUI is certainly a simpler beast to operate than even something like Logic Pro X. It’s undoubtedly an easy piece of software to use, though.

Not exactly a wide range of options for the artist looking for a unique sound. Custom style options that you can configure, but the range of options is the choice of two sets of three buttons: warm, balanced, or open, and low, medium, or high intensity.The whole point of the software, after all, is to make the mastering process more straightforward by letting the computer do the hard work - but how much creative decision-making do you have to give up for LANDR’s ease of use? Rather a lot. LANDR asks the artist to relinquish most of its control and trust that the AI knows best. So far, so high-tech, but what can an artist do with the tool? It boasts that the software is always getting better thanks to behind-the-scenes learning algorithms. LANDR’s cloud-computing software is based on research done at the Queen Mary University of London into automated audio mastering algorithms.